The Establishment Strikes Back: Axelrod’s Unhinged Attack on Francesca Hong

Francesca Hong, Wisconsin’s Democratic gubernatorial hopeful, has earned a reputation for unapologetic progressive politics. Her commitment to democratic socialism has made her a lightning rod for criticism from those who fear she’s too radical for Wisconsin voters.

The party establishment’s discomfort with Hong is rooted in her willingness to challenge entrenched interests. In contrast to party leaders who often prioritize pragmatism over principle, Hong’s approach has sparked concern among those within the Democratic Party. David Axelrod, a veteran strategist who helped guide Barack Obama to two presidential victories, took aim at Hong on social media, labeling her a “zany liberal.” This attack is not just a personal criticism but also reflects a deeper issue within the party.

Axelrod’s 2012 presidential campaign was built on the promise of change. However, as the party has moved further to the center in an effort to appeal to moderates, progressive voices like Hong have been pushed to the periphery. This trend is evident across the country: Democratic candidates who refuse to toe the party line are increasingly being castigated by those within their own ranks.

Axelrod’s use of dismissive language – “zany liberal” is a pejorative designed to marginalize rather than engage – speaks volumes about the kind of party he and his allies are trying to build. Rather than embracing diversity, they’re opting for a homogenized brand that prioritizes electability over authenticity.

Hong’s candidacy has been fueled by her recognition that Wisconsin’s working-class voters deserve more than empty promises from politicians who have abandoned them in favor of corporate donors. By calling her “zany,” Axelrod and his cohorts are attempting to delegitimize the people whose interests Hong is fighting for. This desperate attempt to silence progressive voices will only further alienate the base that has driven Democratic victories in recent years.

If the party establishment continues down this path, they risk losing the very people who are pushing them towards more meaningful change.